Nevada wants to have unlimited number of parents on birth certificates

Posted on April 28, 2021 4:58 am

Nevada wants to have unlimited number of parents on birth certificates

Staff Report

For more real news see our home page, PressCalifornia.com

A bill in the Nevada state legislature would strike the term mother and father on birth certificates and authorize an unlimited number of adults to be listed.

“We need to contact the Senate Judiciary Members and urge them to oppose AB 115,” the Nevada Family Alliance, a program of Capitol Resource Institute,” said in a statement.

“The passing of this bill could bring complicated and dangerous implications for parents across Nevada.”

The bill was heard this week in the Senate Judiciary Committee. It already passed in the Assembly, where it was sponsored by Assemblywoman Cecelia González (see image), a Democrat.

The Pacific Justice Institute, a legal defense organization specializing in the defense of religious freedom and parental rights, opposes the proposed legislation:

“What this Bill does is radically re-define the parent-child relationship to ask the courts to allow a group of adults (three or more) to have a legally recognized parent-child relationship,” the Sacramento-based institute wrote in submitted testimony.

“This expanded definition is not in the best interest of the child. The Bill offers no functional
framework in which a court is to apply this expanded definition.”

Read AB115

Read the Pacific Justice Institute letter

Spread the love
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JOHN THE FOX
JOHN THE FOX
1 month ago

THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE MALE AND ONE FEMALE PARENT! THAT’S BIOLOGY 101!

Stephen
Stephen
1 month ago

Many people/things/animals/plants on a birth Certificate? WOW and WTF — the number of CRACKPOT IDEAS by DemoRats is without limit.

John Mason
John Mason
1 month ago

Ah – this greatly broadens the anchor baby idea which might be the actual point of the legilstaion

jobardu
jobardu
1 month ago

Wow, all I can say is wow. I think that the best we can do now is take this to its logical conclusion. Not list mother or father, and list family pets for the supportive role they played in creating the child. Of course, you also want to list the Democratic National Committee for their policies encouraging Flexi-children. Ultimately, you want to remove the child’s name from the birth certificate in the interest of security. The child’s name is, after all, personally Identifiable information and cannot be released without the child’s permission. Ask them when they turn 16. The result… Read more »

blatherskite
blatherskite
1 month ago

Imagine having 5 guys paying child support? $

Bruce Pestell
Bruce Pestell
1 month ago

This is another attempt, by the left, to reduce the significance of the traditional family and disconnect children from their parents. The government will take over the responsibility and children will be only dependent on it.

Trev Adams
Trev Adams
1 month ago
Reply to  Bruce Pestell

I disagree on this point, Bruce, it is not the left that seeks to ruin family relationships but their master, Satan. The left are simply dancing to his tune.

Daniel Silvan
Daniel Silvan
1 month ago

Great. Just think of how beneficial this will be for the confused child. When it comes to children, liberals always seem to look at things from their own selfish perspective, never what is best for the child. They always use children to push their lgbt agenda, their sexual perversion agenda by teaching 8 year olds explicit and perverted sexual practices by way of educational curriculum. Meanwhile overall student performance continues to suffer as America continues to drop in the global educational rankings.

John Schilling
John Schilling
1 month ago

THIS IS EFFIN’ GREAT! Hey, all you other suckers, you’re picking up the tab for the twins’ college. They’re both going to Duke, so dig deep!

Mike Dougerty
1 month ago

From a tax return perspective, can each parent then use the child as a deduction on their federal tax return or is it proportional. Also, the cost of raising a child properly, can easily cost over a half million. Is each parent on the birth certificate now financially responsible? This is going to be fun.

Mr Natural
Mr Natural
1 month ago

I get it, “it takes a village” Ha Ha Ha, very funny.

Mr Natural
Mr Natural
1 month ago
Reply to  Mr Natural

It’s obviously a ploy to allow more illegal aliens to have a child in the US.

Stephen
Stephen
1 month ago
Reply to  Mr Natural

Hillary Clinton thought up that line and used it as a title for her book. She wanted a particular destructive result for America, i.e., A communist Hive of dirt poor worker bees with Government workers and politicians living high off the labor of deplorable (and contemptible ) worker bees like you and me. Hillary Clinton deserves to be behind bars for life.

Fred Stevens
Fred Stevens
1 month ago

Democrats are civilization cancer.

Last edited 1 month ago by Fred Stevens
charlie
charlie
1 month ago

Ok, how will they handle claiming a child as a dependent on Fed Tax? Can ALL parents claim the child?/
Whose insurance will cover the kid?
Whose income will qualify for financial assistance in college?
Which adult pays child support is they all divorce?
does the tax payers cover all costs???

A Texan behind enemy lines.
A Texan behind enemy lines.
1 month ago

Nevada used to be a conservative stronghold. Then the first wave of fleeing Californians moved to Las Vegas or Reno…
California really is cancer.

David Ross
David Ross
1 month ago

Amen brother

David Ross
David Ross
1 month ago

In her case it may be true. When you pull a train you can’t be sure whose little swimmer did the job.

nemo
nemo
1 month ago

I hate this world.

Fred Stevens
Fred Stevens
1 month ago

LOL but they will be the first ones to shout “Science is real”

It is, of course.

Democrats are science deniers.

Highrise
Highrise
1 month ago
Reply to  Fred Stevens

Haha you know it!